Terri;184259 said:Hey Kevin, just a nudge to remind you to look at post #496, It seems a little different than any others at this site, I don't quite know what to make of it.
It looks like one of those little BC's, any chance of a side view to show any curvature? It looks like it is preserved a lot better than all the others, is it silicified?
Terri;184260 said:Here's another (I have several more from the last ime out). My first thought was a badly crushed coiled nautiloid OR just a mish mash of ceph parts, the third pic. is the bottom of the fossil, bottom center you can see where a few septa wrap around the side of the rock.
My take on this rock:
Yellow is a gastropod, red is brachiopods, blue, some kind of encrusting bryozoan? green is 1 cephalopod for sure, and 1 possible. I can't tell from the photo where the one on the bottom matches up with those on top. If they do prove to be connected it could be a coiled nautiloid.
Terri;184285 said:What do you mean," having trouble with the age and stratigraphy"? That the site these fossils are coming from are not Sandbian like we thought?
The Lebanon Limestone is part of the Stones River Group (Upper Sandbian), I was looking at something that was Middle Katian (Maysvillian of Frey), I didn't notice all the others that are Upper Sandbian (Rocklandian of Frey), my mistake.
Keep 'em coming Terri, I'll try to keep up.