Terri;182564 said:...so there's no evidence at all of a colossal squid being present? Hypothesis reached only on the basis of the (odd?) layout of the fossils,.
Normally I would take Clem's point of view but I could never explain this as anything but she wanted an esthetic outside her new brood den (it was completely across the tank - at least 3 feet - close to where she initially thought about brooding). Moving across the stubstrate is one thing but watch how she sets it up at the end.
Terri;182594 said:It would be really interesting to read the rest of that paper.
[SIZE=-2]National Geographic[/SIZE] | The giant, prehistoric squid that ate common sense [SIZE=-1]Ars Technica[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]A big one, in fact, and today that problem takes the form of a giant, prehistoric squid with tentacles so formidable that it has sucked the brains right out of staff writers' heads. While making the rounds among a few California museums late last month ...[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]Kraken Sea Monster Account "Bizarre and Miraculous"[SIZE=-1]National Geographic[/SIZE][/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]"Kraken" sea monster emerges from mythological mists[SIZE=-1]CBS News[/SIZE][/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]You're Kraken Me Up[SIZE=-1]Science 2.0[/SIZE][/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]Herald Sun -Popular Science -Los Angeles Times[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]all 120 news articles[/SIZE] |