Overflow box or Bulkhead w/strainer?

Discussion in 'Tank Talk' started by bassman, Nov 15, 2006.

  1. bassman

    bassman Blue Ring Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am in the planning stages of building a new octopus tank. I am uncertain as to whether I should incorporate an overflow box on the back of the tank with slits built into the rear tank wall to feed it or just use a 1.5" bulkhead with a strainer on it instead.

    I currently run two tanks (20 gal) off the side of my sump using bulkheads with strainers and they seem to work fine.

    Is there any reason a overflow box would work better that I am unware of?


    Thanks.
     
  2. DHyslop

    DHyslop Architeuthis Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,713
    Likes Received:
    3
    An overflow box would give you a bit more surface water going in (which is a good thing, especially if it was a reef), but on the other hand is generally more difficult to octo-proof. If you've had good luck with lonely bulkheads there's no harm in sticking with it in the new tank. There's a lot to be said for keeping it simple.

    Here's pictures of my overflow. As you can see I went the route of putting slits in the wall. I did this primarily because I like to to tinker: I like it, but I wouldn't recommend it to others unless they get as much joy as I do grinding glass with a Dremel tool for 9 hours :)

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  3. bassman

    bassman Blue Ring Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for the reply and the pics. I actually envisioned having to make the overflow box exactly the way you have. I am one for tinkering and DIY projects but I think in this case the bulkhead will work just as well and be much easier to incorporate.
     

Share This Page