Pre-senescence aging

Decay

Blue Ring
Registered
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
37
this might be a dumb question, but i have recently been wondering if octopuses age in a similar way to humans. do they experience a decline in strength, coordination and cognition or do they simply remain in their "prime" until senescence kicks in?

should someone feed an older octopus smaller prey items and give it less complex puzzles to solve to avoid stressing it and causing overexertion?
 
In my experience (at least with NZ species) there doesn't seem to be a huge decline, they seem to slow up on feeding and get a little lethargic then suddenly they're senescent (in males), in females the first sign is usually egg laying!.

J
 
In animals where so much energy is placed into reproduction and subsequent egg-laying, the decline seems to differ by sex. The females are brooding eggs for months and tend to decline at a much slower pace. The males seem to start their decline, at least mentally, soon after reproduction and it seems to be a fast change.

Some octopus will decline sooner than others, just as some humans decline quicker than others.

Greg
 
Going on the thin ice of hypotheticals, since cephs only reproduce once, and don't care for their offspring after hatching, it would seem that they have a lot less benefit from staying healthy after reproducing. Not that they have evolutionary pressure to die immediately, but they have a lot less pressure to survive than animals that might reproduce again, or that, like mammals, have to raise their offspring until they can take care of themselves. These sorts of discussions are always more complicated than they seem, though: before reproduction, there's a lot of survival and fitness needs, and there's not a lot of incentive to "switch off" all that, either, particularly since the young migrate away from the parents, so the parent isn't taking up resources the offspring need. There might be incentive for the female to get as fit as possible, then switch off and only take care of the eggs, but it's harder to see that in the males. On the other hand, maybe the males just have inherited the this aspect of the females' physiology, since they don't have reason not to, just like men having nipples...

Going a bit far afield of the original topic: we don't even know, AFAICT, what genetic or epigenetic or environmental control causes an octopus to be male or female; they don't have analogous X and Y sex chromosomes that anyone has discovered so far, and many of their gastropod relatives are hermaphroditic. Steve O pointed me at an article on a South African squid species where a few individuals show both male and female traits, so there's some opportunity in at least one ceph species for gender ambiguity.

Since it's been found that the octopus optic gland influences the onset of sexual maturity, I have to wonder if there is or was some evolutionary advantage to having the animals recognize favorable conditions for reproduction, and then flip the switch to go into full-on breeding mode. The mass spawning of some squids seems to be an example of this, but it's less clear why octopuses might do it; perhaps it's carryover from much older cephalopods? Of course, nautlius and cuttlefish don't seem to do anything like this, and lay eggs over a long period, so it's not all cephs. Does anyone know anything about Vampyroteuthis or Cirrate octo reproduction? Or Spirula?
 
gjbarord;128157 said:
In animals where so much energy is placed into reproduction and subsequent egg-laying, the decline seems to differ by sex. The females are brooding eggs for months and tend to decline at a much slower pace. The males seem to start their decline, at least mentally, soon after reproduction and it seems to be a fast change.

Some octopus will decline sooner than others, just as some humans decline quicker than others.

Greg

My males lived much longer than my females and I think Thales has had some of the same results with some of his batches. So cuttlefish (or at least S. bandensis may not follow this trend. The more we learn about cephs, the less they seem to follow the long held belief of mate once, lay eggs and die...
 
monty;128163 said:
Going on the thin ice of hypotheticals, since cephs only reproduce once, and don't care for their offspring after hatching, it would seem that they have a lot less benefit from staying healthy after reproducing. Not that they have evolutionary pressure to die immediately, but they have a lot less pressure to survive than animals that might reproduce again, or that, like mammals, have to raise their offspring until they can take care of themselves.

Actually, they would have pressure to off themselves... They'd be competing for resources with their offspring. :baby::goodbye: It is essentially the same everywhere. We humans die off after we pass breeding age, too. :sink:

I read your other thread about the optic gland... I'd be expect it would greatly increase longevity. (Sounds like a Masters/Phd project to me, except that it would take too long to yield results) .... and I'd also be interested to see if older octopi are smarter.
 
Perhaps I need to put some more thought into having kids. Yikes...:tomato:

My thoughts on longevity are in terms of wild animals. This discussion seems simililar to one in the past. I would think that senescent males would be eaten before they died of anything else. Animals in captivity have it all so there may be no difference in longevity between sexes. You might say they are spoiled... :roflmao:

Greg
 

Shop Amazon

Shop Amazon
Shop Amazon; support TONMO!
Shop Amazon
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Back
Top