• TONMOCON VII Announced | MBL at Woods Hole | Apr 6-8, 2018
  • Thanks for visiting! TONMO is the world's greatest online cephalopod enthusiast community, with interactive content going back to May of 2000, and a biennial conference. If you'd like to join in on the fun, become a TONMO member -- it's easy and free. You can follow us on Facebook and Twitter for more cephy goodness.

Plenum System Question

squall7733

O. vulgaris
Registered
Joined
Oct 19, 2005
Messages
98
#1
Hello :)

First of all this isnt an octo tank question, its for my main reef tank. I'm just trying to get a variety of answers and you guys are so helpful! :)

I have a 150G. setup thats been running for quite some time now, its a very mature tank.

Since day 1 I have been running a reverse flow undergravel filter, a canister filter, a skimmer and tons of live rock. So lots of filtration in the tank.

I was wondering how it would effect the tank if I removed the undergravel filter tubes. Just like a plenum it would create a dead space under the substrate. The idea is that the dead space helps in the denitrifying process.

Will this work in my setup? Does anyone have experience with Plenum systems ? :)

Any responses very much appreciated! Thank you.
 

DHyslop

Architeuthis
Supporter
Joined
Dec 22, 2004
Messages
1,713
#2
Octos are said to be adept at discovering undergravel filters, pulling them up and making them their homes.

I've never tried one, but I think that a plenum probably isn't the best way to get NNR. If you think about how the process occurs in nature, this reduction happens because of microbes that like to live in substrate and not open water--hence why people use deep sand beds. Now given that, DSBs aren't usually recommended for octo tanks either.

Dan
 

Jean

Colossal Squid
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
4,218
Location
Dunedin, New Zealand
#4
DHyslop said:
Octos are said to be adept at discovering undergravel filters, pulling them up and making them their homes.
Agreed, I've lost count of the times I've fished our midget octopus out from under the filter!

J
 

squall7733

O. vulgaris
Registered
Joined
Oct 19, 2005
Messages
98
#5
This is for my reef tank so I dont have to worry about an octo tearing up the filter.

I'd really like to get rid of those raiser tubes :p but before I do it I'd like to be sure that it wont wreak havic on the enviroment.
 

DHyslop

Architeuthis
Supporter
Joined
Dec 22, 2004
Messages
1,713
#6
If its for a reef I'd say go with a deep sand bed. Don't take my word for it because there are those who believe it will destroy your system :)

Dan
 

Feelers

Vampyroteuthis
Registered
Joined
Jul 10, 2005
Messages
332
#7
Loads of arguments over that dsb timebomb thing. If you have it in the fuge you can clean the sand out every year or something, and you wont have the brown dirty sand that many people get. I think a popular trend is a 1/2 inch sand bed at the front with a bb and sprey bars at the back, meaning you get the look of sand, but without the crud build up.

Remember if you wanna run zeovit or similar you cant have a dsb(from memory), however both will give good colours to sps corals.
 

squall7733

O. vulgaris
Registered
Joined
Oct 19, 2005
Messages
98
#8
I guess I'll just play it safe and leave it like it is :p

Not too sure I really have options, the tank is fully mature and established and pulling out those undergravel plates would probly be classified as messing with the system a little bit too much. I've heard of alot of people running plenums for reefs for years and years, but I dont really understand the pros and cons of it.
 

Feelers

Vampyroteuthis
Registered
Joined
Jul 10, 2005
Messages
332
#9
I think a plenum is one of the older-school ideas. I dont think people who are setting up new tanks generally use them.
But if it might destroy your system it isnt worth removing, especially since it doesnt sound like your having any problems.
 

Members online