• TONMOCON VII Announced | MBL at Woods Hole | Apr 6-8, 2018
  • Thanks for visiting! TONMO is the world's greatest online cephalopod enthusiast community, with interactive content going back to May of 2000, and a biennial conference. If you'd like to join in on the fun, become a TONMO member -- it's easy and free. You can follow us on Facebook and Twitter for more cephy goodness.


Orthocone Pathology

Architeuthoceras

Architeuthis
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
2,404
Location
somewhere under the desert sky
#1

While enlarging this picture to put on my web site I noticed an anomaly in the very fine transverse lirae. Upon closer inspection I found that the shell had been damaged and repaired a few times. I don't think the mantle was ever harmed but the front edge of the shell obviously was. Could this be the result of environmental factors or the product of failed predation? Or both?

The following pics were taken through the lens of my microscope. The diameter of the shell near the injury is approx. 6mm.
 

Jean

Colossal Squid
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
4,218
Location
Dunedin, New Zealand
#2
Hi Kevin,

I dunno about ancient forms but modern molliscs can definitely repair their shells, often from quite dramatic damage.

Also I have a nautilus shell that has evidence of repaired damage. In modern molluscs the mantle can retract pretty darn fast so the shell can be damaged without harming anything else, I s'poseit culd be the same for these ancient forms?

J
 

Phil

TONMO Supporter
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
3,034
#3
Hi Kevin

I'm afraid I really don't have any idea what caused this.

One thought is that it may have been some form of parasitic infection causing blistering on the shell. According to Neale Monk's Ammonites blisters have been observed on the shell of the heteromorph ammonite Baculites (p.105). I would imagine clear deformation would be a result. Maybe this is similar, and you have a particularly sick orthocone with multiple infections?

Just guessing...

Phil
 

Architeuthoceras

Architeuthis
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
2,404
Location
somewhere under the desert sky
#5
Thanks for that Phil :)

Growth line interruption in the form of repair of minor shell damage at the aperture, commonplace in contemporary Nautilus, is essentially absent in Baculites, suggesting that its members fed on small prey in the water column.
I don't understand why the size of prey would determine the amount of shell damage and repair, when this nautiloid is much smaller than mature baculites? Unless these small orthocones were savage beasts attacking animals many times their own size :roll:

Or is that referring to position in the water column?
 

Phil

TONMO Supporter
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
3,034
#6
Yes, I quite agree. That statement does not make any sense does it?

As an aside, I have read that the straight-shelled ammonite Baculites had no counterweight at the apex of its shell and, unlike orthocones, would have hung vertically in the water. If they could swim at all, and did not simply bounce along the bottom sediment looking for crustaceans to eat, then they could only have swum vertically. Orthocones probably had a horizontal posture, maybe the difference in lifestyle is what is being driven at. On the other hand, maybe these baculites undertook vertical migrations during the day and night like many modern squid?

Not sure....it's certainly a weird statement. Perhaps orthocones were just bullies! :heee:
 

Architeuthoceras

Architeuthis
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
2,404
Location
somewhere under the desert sky
#7
I suppose that a Baculite filter feeding in the water column would have less chance of shell damage than a small nautiloid down on the floor bouncing off corals, brachiopods and other things. Or maybe the prey items were just taking one last nip on their tormenter? Like that mouse pointing it's middle finger at that owl. :|
 

Members online