News item about Ordovician extinction

Discussion in 'Cephalopod Fossils' started by Melissa, Apr 10, 2005.

  1. Melissa

    Melissa Larger Pacific Striped Octopus Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2003
    Messages:
    1,137
    Likes Received:
    0
    Astronomy and oceanography collide:

    "In the latest issue of the Astrophysical Journal Letters, scientists argue that a gamma ray burst, the most powerful explosion that occurs in the universe, was responsible for the Ordovican mass extinction in which
    60% of all marine invertebrates died."

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1456594,00.html
     
  2. DHyslop

    DHyslop Architeuthis Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,713
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ah, once again physicists have decided they're better paleontologists than the paleontologists :)

    Dan
     
  3. Clem

    Clem Architeuthis Supporter Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2003
    Messages:
    1,839
    Likes Received:
    49
    Luis and Walter Alvarez, we're looking in your direction...
     
  4. Phil

    Phil Colossal Squid Supporter Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2002
    Messages:
    3,034
    Likes Received:
    16
    Thanks Melissa,

    Well, I'd always thought the Ordovician extinction was due to a global ice-age and widespread glaciation. I wonder if the two theories have been combined somehow? Maybe the gamma-ray burst could have triggered the ice-age in some way? Must try and find the whole text.

    It's always fun to think of 'what if' scenarios. Imagine if there had been no Ordovician extinction? Would the giant orthoconic nautiloids have survived for much longer? Would the ammonoids have appeared? Hmm........
     
  5. spartacus

    spartacus Haliphron Atlanticus Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2004
    Messages:
    602
    Likes Received:
    0
    ......& without the giant orthoconic nautiloids would there have been "Cornettos" ?

    Keef
     
  6. monty

    monty Colossal Squid Staff Member Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,887
    Likes Received:
    11
    Here's the full text:

    http://xxx.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0309415

    This is the URL mentioned in the NASA press release. It has pretty pictures:

    http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/starsgalaxies/gammaray_extinction.html

    the first author's web page is

    http://kusmos.phsx.ku.edu/~melott/Melott.html

    It sounds like they believe that UV exposure caused the extinction, and there doesn't appear to be any notion of a correlated ice age (although I only read the conclusion section in detail).
     
  7. Architeuthoceras

    Architeuthoceras Architeuthis Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2002
    Messages:
    2,389
    Likes Received:
    92
    Location:
    somewhere under the desert sky
    From the NASA link

     
  8. monty

    monty Colossal Squid Staff Member Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,887
    Likes Received:
    11
    oops. I should've read a little more closely before posting... had to finish my taxes, though...:oops:
     
  9. Architeuthoceras

    Architeuthoceras Architeuthis Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2002
    Messages:
    2,389
    Likes Received:
    92
    Location:
    somewhere under the desert sky
    :notworth: Thank You for posting those links Monty :notworth: , I just tried to read the first one, it does mention the glacial event, its hidden in the middle of all those numbers :lol:
     
  10. Fujisawas Sake

    Fujisawas Sake Larger Pacific Striped Octopus Supporter Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,169
    Likes Received:
    2
    Good paper, good hypothesis.

    To piggyback on this paper, this is related to Carl Sagan's "nuclear winter" theory. In the book Cosmos, Sagan proposed that the dust scattered by high-yeild thermonuclear devices would lead to global cooling and a corresponding ice age. Now, while the dust by itself would remain for some time, Sagan went on to describe the conversion of atmospheric nitrogen into ozone-depleting oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) which would further scatter light and cool the Earth even more. The situation given here is less extreme (no nuclear bombs), but a nasty blow to a world dependent on photosynthesis and where a majority of your life is shallow water planktonic-dependent. We're talking a massive amount of devastation in a very short (geologically-speaking) amount of time.

    This is a good hypothesis. Hmm... if it were within a 6000 ly distance, that would put it relatively in our neighborhood. Such a burst might be traced back to a supermassive start collapsing into a neutron star or black hole, both of which can be detected, even this long after the initial event. As far as local black holes are considered, the only one of which I know is Cygnus X-1, but that's a cool 11,000 light years from us. Neutron stars exist in decent numbers. But I'm only an amateur astronomer, so what do I know?

    Its a good hypothesis. Any alternatives out there?

    Thanks for the food for thought.

    John
     
  11. Snafflehound

    Snafflehound GPO Registered

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2004
    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    0
    Now isn't the problem with a gamma-ray burst that it only affects one hemisphere, namely the one pointed towards the burst at the time the shockwave arrives?*

    Let's say one arrived right now from Polaris, and cooked the northern hemisphere... the Indonesian, Kiwis and Aussies would get their chance to rule the world ;)

    *Edit - now I read the paper I see the NOx smog, and depleted ozone, propagate to the other hemisphere after the bust and thus become global in extent. OK, it could have happened. But until they find a radioisotopic signature of the event it's going to be rather "what-if" ish isn' it?
     
  12. Fujisawas Sake

    Fujisawas Sake Larger Pacific Striped Octopus Supporter Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,169
    Likes Received:
    2
    Actually, I don't think you would find a radio-active decay signature here because the culprits were cosmic rays and UV photons, which would have HEAVILY been blocked by the Van Allen belts and Ozone. Also, the NOx's woudl have broken down in a few years, not leaving a trace a trace of "radiation" (nuclear decay) per se. The evidence might be unlockable in deep ice cores (if such ancient ice cores exist) or in some ancient atmospheric nitrogen sinks.

    And like I said, this paper is merely a hypothesis for now... The testing is a bit out of reach of our technology at the moment.

    John
     
  13. Phil

    Phil Colossal Squid Supporter Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2002
    Messages:
    3,034
    Likes Received:
    16
    There may be a potential problem with this theory that the Ordovician extinction was not limited to a single event 445 million years ago, but was supposed to have happened to two phases, at the beginning and end of the glacial event. The onset of glaciation led to a massive sea level drop, maybe as much as 100m, causing changes to oceanic circulation patterns and widespread disruption to marine communities. The second burst of extinction came at the end with the return to warmer conditions marking the beginning of the Silurian. The second glacial period at the end of the Ordovician may have lasted around 500,000 years. The problem here is that apparantly most of the extinctions took place amongst deep water forms (trilobites, brachiopods) which is not really what one would expect for a gamma-ray burst.

    Here's an interesting paper on the event for anyone interested:

    The Late Ordovician Mass Extinction by Peter Sheehan (2001)

    As for cephalopods, Sheehan records:

    I'm afraid that ice-cores are out for such an ancient period, FJ. Maybe someone could do work on fossilised plankton though?
     
  14. Fujisawas Sake

    Fujisawas Sake Larger Pacific Striped Octopus Supporter Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,169
    Likes Received:
    2
    Phil,

    Well, the burst would probably not have caused everything singlehandedly. This theory is a bit hung up on that idea, and I'm not too sold on it myself. Its like the death of the dinosaurs; they seemed to be on their way out anyway, either evolving to diferent forms or vanishing altogether. The comet or asteroid was probably the final nail in their coffin as the Order Dinosauria. I have the feeling that there was more than meets the fossil here. I get the feeling that most mass extinctions are caused by "a series of unfortunate events" (with all due respect to Lemony Snickett) which come together in a mass harmonic convergence of 'sucktitude'. :wink:

    The burster idea is good, but I would hardly say perfect. AND, as much as I tend to be a little cynical in my scientific sense, it looks good as the prelude for a grant proposal to get the money to build a kicka$$ space probe to detect them. Sorry to say it like that, but with science not taking a front-seat in this country, you need to find money any where you can... :hmm:

    Thanks for the link.

    John
     
  15. DHyslop

    DHyslop Architeuthis Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,713
    Likes Received:
    3

    Signor/Lipps :p

    Dan
     
  16. spartacus

    spartacus Haliphron Atlanticus Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2004
    Messages:
    602
    Likes Received:
    0
    If someone's after funding for a probe, they've missed the boat ! :sad:
    The NASA lead Swift mission is detecting GRB's as I type. I was going to poach some of it's "coded mask" technology for my "Super Suture Searcher" but I had to pull the plug due to a lack of investors & aptitude !

    Keef
     

Share This Page