Dear TONMO and all it's members Last night History Channel premiered a show called: MonsterQuest: The Humboldt Squid Found. One year ago, I worked with the production company to help make this show. My exposure to this documentary was when I viewed the debut broadcast with the rest of the world on Wednesday, November 14th 2007. There are several errors in the documentary and since I was directly involved with the expedition as a research facilitator and explorer, I feel ethically obligated to present the facts for what they are and make corrections when errors are made. I was not involved with the writing of this story, the editing, or the scientific, technical accuracy of this production. The only time I saw the footage of the “very large squid in question” was the day we shot it. I requested a copy of the footage several times to analyze it but was turned down. I strongly believe that it was Architeuthis (not Dosidicus) but of course cannot confirm it due to the absence of ‘tell tale’ morphological structures like chitenous ring-teeth, wing (fin) shape, and size to mantle ratio and tentacle shape – length. Below is a black and white of the show. What the documentary claims is titled as Myth. The Facts are presented clearly and a brief Explanation is given. The Explanation does not include my opinion. That is for another forum. As always, my films, footage, still photographs, observations and diving methodology is available to the scientific and educational communities for the advancement of knowledge and support of on going research. Myth 1 The squid was 54 feet long Fact I doubt the squid could be that big simply because the video footage analysis was not done correctly and subsequently over-estimated the size of the creature. Explanation 1) The forensic video analyst erroneously identified a scrape on the animal’s skin at the head-mantle intersection was a reflection in the eye. Since the scrape would be a significant distance from the eye, the overall size calculation cannot be used, therefore it is simply not an accurate size assessment. 2) Based on personal experience in situ over a decade of seeing large squid, I strongly believe that the squid in the sequence is large, probably in excess of 25 feet, but considering the quality of the footage a precise size assessment cannot be made. Myth 2 The “Camera Squid” I was holding was 8 feet long and 200 pounds Fact He was only 4.5 feet long and weighed an estimated 45-50 pounds Explanation I wasn’t a part of the writing or scientific, technical accuracy. I am 69 inched tall and with long bladed fins am approx 100 inches. If you use that as a scale when watching the documentary you can easily gage the size of the Camera squid. Myth 3 The Trojan Squid “Psuedomorph” (or “Sue” for short) was incredibly successful. Fact It failed. Explanation The deployment of Sue was difficult and when performed, no squid approached it and no squid attacked it. If you watch the sequence, you will notice that the ‘jigged’ Humboldt squid that attacked it was actually caught on a traditional jig with a camera attached to it. Myth 4 The expedition was performed in Cabo Fact It was performed solely in Loreto, Baja California Sur Explanation I wasn’t a part of the writing or scientific, technical accuracy. Thank you for your time.