Yes , we found a few of these which we thought were Glyps and when we prepped them discovered they turned into Didymoceras-like critters. They could be dimorphic pairs with the male being a small Glyp and the female being larger with room for egg masses?
We have only found a few with the final helical sections, most are just the torticone and gyrcone, so it may be an artifact of the weakest section being where the helical part begins.
I should have re-read this thread before commenting, there are at least some answers and interesting papers on the first few pages of the thread! Still....
Section 4.4. "3D visualisation of ontogenetical stages" doesn't state how the modes of life were reconstructed (perhaps that's in the paper in press?). I'm surprised to see that Okamoto & Shibata 1997 (see earlier in this thread) is not referenced in the paper.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.