• TONMOCON VII Announced | MBL at Woods Hole | Apr 6-8, 2018
  • Thanks for visiting! TONMO is the world's greatest online cephalopod enthusiast community, with interactive content going back to May of 2000, and a biennial conference. If you'd like to join in on the fun, become a TONMO member -- it's easy and free. You can follow us on Facebook and Twitter for more cephy goodness.


Fossil Info Requested

Reighan

Pygmy Octopus
Registered
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
9
#1
Hi! I'm Reighan. I haven't posted until now because there hadn't been any cephalopods in the local glacial deposits I've been studying. (I'm a beginner.)

But this one seems to be an orthoconic nautiloid?



And then there is this, which looks like aragonite. Is it some kind of cephalopod?







Any comments will be appreciated! Thanks in advance.
 

Architeuthoceras

Architeuthis
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
2,404
Location
somewhere under the desert sky
#5
:welcome: Reighan.

The first photo is probably an orthoconic nautiloid as you thought, a little out of focus, but it looks like septa with some cameral deposits and a siphuncle.
I dont know about the fossil in the other 3 photos, it looks more like a crinoid stem than a cephalopod shell.
 

Reighan

Pygmy Octopus
Registered
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
9
#6
Thank you, Kevin. The material from the glacial deposit is providing an unending educational experience. So far the crinoidal things have been Carboniferous calcite-in-limestone and some Ca-Mg impressions, so the aragonite would be a new one... Thanks again!

Reighan
 

Phil

TONMO Supporter
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
3,034
#7
Glad you made it over here Reighan, and welcome to TONMO.

Definitely a nautiloid that first one, and a nice find too. Was that your first from Wales?
 

Reighan

Pygmy Octopus
Registered
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
9
#8
Hi, Phil

Just popped in and found this message. Sorry it took so long to respond. I've been bogged down with rocks and minerals. (BTW, the 'aragonite' in the non-ceph above is quartz .) (So much to learn...)
The nautiloid above was my first, and so far is the only one. Before I found that, we'd found only corals, crinoid bits, and brachiopods in Carboniferous limestone, which is why I noticed the nautiloid--because of the matrix! I'd never found anything at all in New Jersey, so the glacial drift on this beach is overwhelming (but wonderful). The more Mike & I learn, the more things we recognize and find, so... there are probably cephalopods out there somewhere. The most recent good 'un is a bit of chalk cidaroid.

ATB,
Reighan
 

Phil

TONMO Supporter
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
3,034
#9
Well, it may be your first, but it's certainly a good place to start! Well done! Keep going, you'll get a corker one of these days, trust me.
 

Reighan

Pygmy Octopus
Registered
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
9
#11
Thanks, Phil, for the encouragement. :smile:

And, thank you, Kevin, for the suggested ID. Sorry about my misidentified mineral. :oops: I Google-ed 'Actinocerid', and followed a lot of tangents, and learned quite a bit, so thanks for that as well.

ATB,

Reighan
 

Phil

TONMO Supporter
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
3,034
#12
I just tried to find a good basic description of Actinocerid nautiloids but to my horror found that the superlative website Paleos has been taken down for good! Oh no, this is terrible news.

I believe that the siphuncle is sub-ventral in these forms and tends to bulge out into each chamber like a inflated ring; these rings also contain heavy cameral deposits used as counterweights to control the orientation of the conch.

Hopefully Kevin will have a much better description.
 

Reighan

Pygmy Octopus
Registered
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
9
#13
Thanks, Phil. That helps. Even considering my lack of knowledge, there didn't seem to be a lot of information on Actinocerids. Initially I got the impression they were all Australasian, which would have been a stretch even for this drift. :lol: But if mine is an actinocerid, then it's probably Silurian? 8-)
 

aNmLlUvR09

Cuttlefish
Registered
Joined
Oct 13, 2005
Messages
16
#14
this is absolutely the most interesting message board i've ever been on...i dont understand half of what anyone is saying and its so thrilling! :)
 

Phil

TONMO Supporter
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
3,034
#15
Reighan;79257 said:
Thanks, Phil. That helps. Even considering my lack of knowledge, there didn't seem to be a lot of information on Actinocerids. Initially I got the impression they were all Australasian, which would have been a stretch even for this drift. :lol: But if mine is an actinocerid, then it's probably Silurian? 8-)
Well, according to Clarkson's book the Actinceratina were a Suborder of Orthoceratid nautiloid that thrived from the early Ordovician (when most of the Orders and Suborders appeared) but became extinct in the early Carboniferous. I'm pretty certain that their distribution was global and I'm sure that examples of actinceratids have been found as wide afield as Utah, Japan and Europe. Rayonnoceras is a particularly well known form. Maybe it is worth asking which nautiloids are known from Wales on Joe and Lucy's site?

aNmLlUvR09 said:
this is absolutely the most interesting message board i've ever been on...i dont understand half of what anyone is saying and its so thrilling! :)
Don't worry, old chap. I've no idea what people are talking about on here either most of the time, and I've been here for four years! :wink:
 

Architeuthoceras

Architeuthis
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
2,404
Location
somewhere under the desert sky
#16
Here I go using some more big words...

Actinocerids are characterized by usually having cyrtochoanitic septal necks, convex/bulbous connecting rings, annulosiphonate endosiphuncular deposits with canals running radially from a central hollow, and cameral deposits that can show up on all sides of the chamber.
alot of times the only thing preserved is the siphuncle which would basically look like a straight string of pearls.
below is a photo of a longitudinal section of Rayonnoceras, an actinocerid from the Mississippian of Utah. Rayonnoceras was one of the last of the actinocerids, they are more a Silurian to Devonian ceph.
 

Attachments

Reighan

Pygmy Octopus
Registered
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
9
#17
aNmLlUvR09: I usually have to read everything with heavy use of books and a web browser. :smile: I try to do the same thing when I post but, as you can see from this thread, I still get things very wrong sometimes. :oops:

Phil: I'm passing the information on to Joe and Lucy. It kinda puts experts at a disadvantage when I provide inaccurate data... :oops: , so I'm grateful for the information I get here. Makes life easier for everyone. Another complication is that we're not sure where my rocks are coming from. (Any glaciologists out there?) :hmm:

We're currently focused on 'new1', a rock with lots of bits (mostly brachs, no obvious cephs) showing on the surface that I haven't seen in anything else I've found. (I'm hoping it's a very old one; at least it is a very different one.)

Kevin: Thank you for the very useful big words :smile:
and for the picture. I hope I can use the terminology some day... it's more accurate and it would reduce my verbosity. :grin:

Reighan
 

Members online

No members online now.