Colossal Squid or Whale Carcass? | The Octopus News Magazine Online
  • Thanks for visiting! TONMO is the world's greatest online cephalopod enthusiast community, with interactive content going back to May of 2000, and a biennial conference. If you'd like to join in on the fun, become a TONMO member -- it's easy and free. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter for more cephy goodness.

Colossal Squid or Whale Carcass?

DWhatley

Cthulhu
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
19,999
Location
Gainesville, GA
#2
It certainly looks more like a Baleen whale than any kind of squid. Note that the post is a personal observation and not a news item.
 

Ryan Smith

Wonderpus
Registered
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Messages
193
#4
Its a whale... If this was a... for example 50 ft squid, the mantle would be 40 of those feet and tentacles 10 ft. A 4:1 mantle to tentacle ratio wouldnt be correct. Most cases, arent squid tentacles longer than their mantle?
 

robyn

Vampyroteuthis
Supporter
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
299
#7
I see the caption beneath the photo now reads 'decaying cetacean', although the file name has not been changed. I don't think there's much doubt that that is a whale.
 

Darth Kraken

Blue Ring
Registered
Joined
Jun 21, 2010
Messages
38
#8
Has there ever been any more evidence other than these things on super-large cephalopods; that is, bigger than the already very big ones we know?
 

OB

Colossal Squid
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Messages
3,086
#9
No, only folklore and anecdotal sightings. The minke in the photograph is not even that far gone and easily recognizable as nothing else but a whale. Globsters are really hard to type morphologically, but DNA or protein analysis consistently show these to be of mammalian origin as well, if we leave the decayed basking sharks aside...
 

OB

Colossal Squid
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Messages
3,086
#10
If you do the mechanics, it becomes very hard for something to grow "very" large unless there is an almost unlimited food source and sufficient time at hand. What we know of extant squid and octopus species, suggests that if a huge cephalopod (even larger than M. hamiltoni with a purported maximum weight of 750 kilograms) would exist under the above given constraints, it would most likely have to live in the pelagic zone. Here it would easily be outcompeted by vertebrate predators. Dosidicus is certainly no pushover, albeit no "true" giant either, but its ability to function in a low oxygen environment is likely what gives it its edge in the "almost apex predator" niche. This leads to the second point; if the pelagic zone were to be where we would find truly gigantic cephalopods, breeding population size would dictate frequent sightings to occur.

A third item up for discussion is, that although an aquatic species need not worry about its weight, its mass does not disappear under water. Momentum is a funny thing when you have no internal skeleton and consist mainly of gelatinous- and muscle tissue; beyond a certain size limit an animal is not likely to be able to propel itself without causing trauma to some of its muscle groups or major organs.
 

OB

Colossal Squid
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Messages
3,086
#12
One isn't only allowed to dream, one should! :wink:
 

Members online

Monty Awards

TONMOCON IV: Terri
TONMOCON V: Jean
TONMOCON VI: Taollan
TONMOCON VII: ekocak

About the Monty Awards