Cephalopod Personality Testing

DWhatley

Certified Ceph Head For Life
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
20,060
Location
Gainesville, GA
#1
Scientific studies have tried to isolate personality traits and apply them to cephalopods. The definition appears to be the display of individual consistent behavior to a given stimulus. If the same behavior is displayed across species, it is considered a species behavior and does not count as a personality trait.. If the animal does not continually repeat the individual behavior, it is not considered a personality trait.
 

DWhatley

Certified Ceph Head For Life
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
20,060
Location
Gainesville, GA
#2
Octopus Studies

HDTV reveals brainy octopus has no personality
New Science Article discussing the below research with input from Dr. Hanlon and a video

Video playback demonstrates episodic personality in the gloomy octopus
R. Pronk1, D. R. Wilson, R. Harcourt1 2009

Coleoid cephalopods, including octopuses, cuttlefish and squid, rely mainly on visual signals when interacting with conspecifics, predators and prey. Presenting visual stimuli, such as models, photographs, mirrors and live conspecifics, can thus provide insight into cephalopod behaviour. These methods, however, have limitations – mirrors and live animals lack experimental control, whereas models and photographs sacrifice motion-based information. Video playback addresses these issues by presenting controlled, moving and realistic stimuli but, to date, video playback has not been used successfully with any cephalopod. Here, we developed a video playback technique for the gloomy octopus (Octopus tetricus) that incorporated recent advances in video technology. We then used this technique to test for personality, which we defined as behavioural differences between individuals that are consistent over time and across ecologically important contexts. We captured wild octopuses and tested them on 3 separate days over a 10 day period. On each test day, subjects were presented with videos of a food item, a novel object and a conspecific. These represented a foraging, novel and threatening context, respectively. A fourth video without a moving stimulus controlled for the playback monitor itself and potential artifacts associated with video playback. Experimental stimuli evoked unambiguous and biologically appropriate responses from the subjects. Furthermore, individuals' responses to the three experimental contexts were highly correlated within a given test day. However, within a given context, individuals behaved inconsistently across the 3 test days. The reordering of ranks suggests that rather than fulfilling the criteria for personality, gloomy octopus show temporal discontinuities, and hence display episodic personality.
 

DWhatley

Certified Ceph Head For Life
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
20,060
Location
Gainesville, GA
#3
Cuttlefish

Consistent individual differences in the behavioural responsiveness of adult male cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis)
Claudio Carere, Giacomo Grignani, Roberto Bonanni, Marco Della Gala, Alessandro Carlini, Dario Angeletti, Roberta Cimmaruta, Giuseppe Nascetti, Jennifer A. Mather 2015

Abstract
Consistent individual differences in clusters of behaviour (animal personalities) are being increasingly recognized by researchers of different disciplines, but studies on invertebrates are still scanty. In order to test for the presence of personality-like individual profiles we assessed the behavioural responsiveness of adult male cuttlefish temporarily kept in captivity and individually housed. We used three different stimulations, adapting a protocol established for octopuses ( Mather and Anderson, 1993 ) to assess individual differences (personalities). In the “alerting test” the behaviour was scored after the human observer lifted the cover of the tank. In the “threat test” the behaviour was scored after the animal was touched with a stick. In the “feeding test” the behaviour was scored after the animal was given a live prey. The relationship among behavioural responses was analysed by principal component analysis, which allowed identifying three dimensions along which individual differences were maximal, accounting for 39.6, 15.6, and 10.3% of the total variance. We found marked individual differences that were consistent across the three tests with respect to behaviours such as floating, staying at the bottom of the tank, and moving the fins. However, behaviours such as “moving” and “changes in body patterning” showed context-dependent variation. This study provides evidence of personality dimensions in cuttlefish with implications about welfare of cephalopods used in research in view of the new EU regulations.
 

DWhatley

Certified Ceph Head For Life
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
20,060
Location
Gainesville, GA
#6
While looking for the article by @ceph, I found this one on the Cephalopod Page by David Sinn

During my research on molluscan behavior at Portland State University in Portland, OR, I applied for and was granted student aid money from the Hawaiian Malacological Society.

Figure 1 - Octopus bimaculoides on eel-grass
Their grant helped allow me to study the behavior of one of the more flamboyant members of the molluscs, the octopuses. Octopus bimaculoides (Fig. 1), the California mud-flat octopus, was the specific animal that I chose to study. For purposes of brevity here, I have excluded my methodology, and have included only general background and results. I am more than happy to forward to any interested readers a more thorough written copy of this work.

First of all, what do we know about octopus behavior? Surprisingly little work has been done quantifying the nature of octopuses, actually. There is, of course, a surplus of anecdotal evidence surrounding the behavioral capabilities of these creatures, but in the scientific literature the number of studies actually documenting such feats is small. That is not to say that these studies do not document an amazing complexity of behavior for these organisms, this is hardly the case. What studies have done is contribute pieces of the how of behavior in this group, as well as speculating on the why of these same acts. The overall picture that we are gaining from our continued studies is that octopuses possess a startling array and complexity of behaviors, and that these behaviors are indicators of a very different life from other marine organisms.

The particular aspect of octopus behavior that fascinated me as I began to study at Portland State was that within the scientific literature, cephalopod researchers have noted consistent variability in individual octopus responses for over 30 years. What I mean by this is that these researchers have been noticing that their study organisms act very differently from one another, in ways that are stable within individuals but consistently different from one another. Essentially, these researchers provided the first notes of the individuality of octopuses, an aspect of behavior normally accorded for primates and other vertebrates. In 1993, two researchers set about to define how octopuses differ from one another, on an individual basis. What Jennifer

Figure 2 - Octopus rubescens with full papillae on sandy bottom
Mather and Roland Anderson discovered was that adult octopuses (their model was Octopus rubescens(Fig. 2)) differ from one another along three dimensions of behavior, which they termed Activity, Reactivity, and Avoidance. With this knowledge then, I attempted to contribute to two little known aspects of behavior in these animals: 1) the development of behavior through systematic documentation of their behavior across the early life, and 2) the how and why of behavior in these animals by examining the psychological trait temperament. For this second aspect, I was interested in knowing if very young octopuses display behaviors that reflect underlying dimensions of temperament, and if so, how these temperamental dimensions develop. For all aspects of research I was interested in contributing to our overall knowledge of the life history of these animals.

Temperament was chosen as the model that best represented these early individual differences in behavior. In humans, temperamental traits are behavioral styles that an individual is born with, are influenced by and influence the environment, and result in the adult personality. A discrete response to a stimulus is not a temperamental trait, rather, a combination of certain responses that an individual shows consistently over time define the behavioral style of a particular individual, and it is these styles that represent expressions of temperament. Temperament dimensions, therefore, can be used to define how very young individuals differ.

Why would researchers be interested in temperament? Over the past few years behaviorists have shown increased interest in the study of individual differences in their subject organisms, as the importance of these traits have been documented. Temperament traits have major heritable components, based in the physiology of the organism, and it is these heritable components that allow these traits to act as evolutionarily selectable material, much like any physical trait. Temperamental traits, or stable individual differences, provide a basis for the development of behavior in a group of animals across evolutionary time through furnishing material for selection.

The study of temperament also allows us to make inferences about the behavioral substrate an individual is born with, and how levels of this substrate differ among individuals. How then do individual O. bimaculoidesdiffer? Do they display behaviors that can be considered individual temperament?The answer is yes. At three weeks of age I was able to identify at least four dimensions of temperament, termed Active Engagement, Arousal/Readiness, Aggression, and Avoidance/Disinterest. These dimensional names represent trait continuums along which young octopuses can be ordered relative to one another. Furthermore, the data indicated that related octopuses were more similar along these dimensions at three weeks of age than ones that were unrelated. While this makes sense intuitively, in behavioral research simple relationships such as "genes make traits" do not exist, and it is extremely difficult to pinpoint the biological basis for behaviors. Showing that this relationship exists for these traits in octopuses is a first step towards learning about the evolution of these behaviors. Furthermore, scientists that study individual differences have hypothesized these heritable components in the expression of temperamental traits, but very few studies across differing taxa have been able to demonstrate this relationship.

What were the particular octopuses like in my study? One brood of octopuses, for example, scored in the median range for Active Engagement, with high Arousal/Readiness scores, high Aggression scores, and high Avoidance/Disinterest scores. This group of octopuses was extremely Reactive, Aroused, and Aggressive, but were not particularly Active or Interested in seeking out contexts in which to be reactive in. This was in contrast to another group of octopuses, who were highly Actively Engaged, not at all Aroused or Ready, highly Aggressive, and not very Avoidant or Disinterested. This second brood at a very early age was particularly Active in Engaging with their environment, acting Aggressively, choosing to act towards or approach stimulus as opposed to assessing situations from afar, or Avoiding them altogether. How each of these strategies might be evolutionarily stable strategies for these organisms was the subject of much of my thesis work.

My study was also longitudinal in nature, and tested these individuals on their four dimensions of temperament throughout the first five months of life. For my master's thesis only the first 9 weeks have been analyzed. Longitudinal results show that from week 3 to week 6 there are major changes in an octopus's approach to its environment, while they become less Actively Engaged, less Aggressive, and more highly Aroused and Ready. Weeks 6 to 9 are a period of more stability, when major changes are not observed along any of the temperament dimensions. I have hypothesized that the major changes observed from week 3 to week 6 represent two major life history changes. The first is the change in the dispersal behaviors of these organisms, and is marked by the significant decrease in Active Engagement and Aggressive behaviors. The second, indicated by these two dimensional changes along with a significant increase in Arousal/Readiness tendencies, I hypothesized is a transition from a life controlled by innately programmed behaviors to one of greater plasticity of response, with arousal mechanisms providing the basis for behaviors expressed in choice mediated contexts. No studies have been performed on O. bimaculoides in the wild with regards to this development;unfortunately with the octopuses what we have are mostly laboratory studies from which we are able to derive information. But by hypothesizing how these dimensions might be important in the early life of these organisms, both at week 3 and across the first nine weeks of life, documenting temperamental trait development allows hypothesis to be made towards an ecological view of the bases for behavior in these marine invertebrates.

Octopuses provide an excellent behavioral model for these types of studies, and also a relatively little known one from the standpoint of the development of behavior. In addition to this, working with this marine mollusc allows us to assess these types of traits in an organism that is so different from the vertebrates in its approach to its environment and its life, and yet probably no less intelligent in its endeavors to do so. I hope that I am fortunate enough to continue my work with cephalopods. I plan to study them for many years to come, and I hope to continue working with organizations such as the HMS in order to do so.
 

mucktopus

Haliphron Atlanticus
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Dec 31, 2003
Messages
523
#7
Sinn has done some very good work in this area:

Sinn, David L., and Natalie A. Moltschaniwskyj. "Personality traits in dumpling squid (Euprymna tasmanica): context-specific traits and their correlation with biological characteristics." Journal of Comparative Psychology 119.1 (2005): 99.

Sinn, David L., Samuel D. Gosling, and Natalie A. Moltschaniwskyj. "Development of shy/bold behaviour in squid: context-specific phenotypes associated with developmental plasticity." Animal Behaviour 75.2 (2008): 433-442.

Sinn, David L., et al. "Are behavioral syndromes invariant? Spatiotemporal variation in shy/bold behavior in squid." Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology64.4 (2010): 693-702.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
19,331
Messages
201,500
Members
8,215
Latest member
mnyegaard

Monty Awards

TONMOCON IV (2011): Terri
TONMOCON V (2013): Jean
TONMOCON VI (2015): Taollan
TONMOCON VII (2018): ekocak

About the Monty Awards
Top