Page 17 of 36 FirstFirst ... 713141516171819202127 ... LastLast
Results 321 to 340 of 707

Thread: Ordovician in Tennessee (Help!)

  1. #321
    Quote Originally Posted by Terri View Post
    Cool, thanks Kevin. With such a constricted aperture, it's hard to imagine what they looked like in life! Were this nautiloids typically small or did they get much larger?
    See Phragmoceras and Hexameroceras on THIS page (The Fossil Book, p. 275), a couple of very constricted apertures, your guess is as good as anyone else's
    Kevin

  2. #322
    Great link Kevin, thanks! I scraped some of the stuff off the top but I just don't think I see anything. Here's a pic.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG1024-2.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	105.7 KB 
ID:	13814  

  3. #323
    Here a few bits and pieces found along with the fossil posted above, the first one maybe another cyrtocone with yet another gastropod in the living chamber? This one enlarges pretty decently.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0757.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	2.42 MB 
ID:	13838  
    Last edited by Terri; Apr 16, '11 at 11:59pm.

  4. #324
    ....and this one, cyrtocone? I can get different views on most of these if needed..
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG1116.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	1.71 MB 
ID:	13839  
    Last edited by Terri; Apr 17, '11 at 12:27am.

  5. #325
    Branching coral??
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG1114.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	1.89 MB 
ID:	13841  

  6. #326
    Quote Originally Posted by Terri View Post
    Here a few bits and pieces found along with the fossil posted above, the first one maybe another cyrtocone with yet another gastropod in the living chamber? This one enlarges pretty decently.
    Yes, hard to see if the gastropod is in or on the body chamber.

    Quote Originally Posted by Terri View Post
    ....and this one, cyrtocone? I can get different views on most of these if needed..
    Cyrtocone

    Quote Originally Posted by Terri View Post
    Branching coral??
    Branching Bryozoan, all the small holes are typical of Bryozoans
    Kevin

  7. #327

  8. #328
    Tiny gastropods, a section of a nautiloid, and a couple orthocones (unless they're gastropods). You can just make out suture lines on the nautiloid if you look closely enough, center bottom of rock and the ?orthocones right side center and top. The gastropods are all so small I wonder , are they a small species or juveniles?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	100_0690.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	1.91 MB 
ID:	13875  

  9. #329
    Looks like a couple of gastropod species, Those with a diamond shape are cool!

    About the same as I found today, only mine are Triassic. I don't think it will ever stop snowing this year.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4-23-11 010.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	160.2 KB 
ID:	13877Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4-23-11 025.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	77.4 KB 
ID:	13876
    Kevin

  10. #330
    Awesome scenery as usual! At least you got out for a while. I love looking at these plates, so many different views, I spend hours with a magnifying glass and it seems every time I look I find something new, I'll have to take another look at the diamond shaped ones.

    Still snowing?! None of that here, but we are getting at least bi-weekly storms with tornadoes, straight line winds, etc....

  11. #331
    Kevin, since you have snow on the ground and can't get out hunting, I think I'll post a bunch of fossils and ask a a lot of annoying questions so you'll have something to do.

  12. #332

  13. #333
    This rock (app. 8 by 9) has a lot going on, I'll show a series of pics. may take a min.
    but in the first few you'll see the round structures and once again I haven't a clue. I've done a lot of searching but haven't found anything similiar. In the 3rd pic. the deflated looking thing to the right of the circular one, I have seen something very close, but i can't find it!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0676.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	1.85 MB 
ID:	13929   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0675.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.96 MB 
ID:	13930  

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0688.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	1.67 MB 
ID:	13931  

  14. #334
    There are some thick chunks of shell here also, 3-4 mm, I haven't seen this before either (just left of center). And to the right, below the ruler possibly a small cephalopod?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0300.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	1.73 MB 
ID:	13960  

  15. #335
    There is a lot going on in that rock. It may take a while to sort it all out.

    If that small thing on the right side isn't a cephalopod... something just kinda says crinoid...

    The round thing has me baffled
    Kevin

  16. #336
    Yeah! I saw that little cone shaped thing with the lines and wondered but felt stupid asking At least I am seeing some of the possibilities in the pictures!
    "D"

    "Of all the things that I have lost, I think I miss my mind the most".

  17. #337
    Yay D! You should know by now that stupid questions are allowed on my threads. I have learned most of what I know by asking what probably seem like not very bright questions. And that little fossil does look cephish but after Kevin pointed it out I see the possibility of crinoid. So I'll take another look at it.

  18. #338
    The round thing has me baffled
    Here's a slightly different view showing the 'round thing" and the crinoid. Did you notice that there are two of the round things? The other one is above and just to the right a little, it's more broken than the other one.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0547.jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	1.92 MB 
ID:	13961  

  19. #339
    Is it possible that it (the round thingys) could be some kind of nut or plant pod rather than an animal?
    "D"

    "Of all the things that I have lost, I think I miss my mind the most".

  20. #340
    Good question D, the evolution of land plants did begin during the Ordovician period, but seed-bearing plants didn't appear in the fossil record for another 85 million years or so. If these fossils were a little younger that would certainly be something to look at, this article is excellent http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embryophyte check out the Horse Chestnut mega-spore, but I'm pretty sure the timing is all wrong. Kevin?

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: Jan 30, '13, 10:09pm
  2. Ordovician Mass Extinction Feb 12
    By Architeuthoceras in forum Nautiloids
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: Feb 27, '09, 11:59am
  3. Ordovician Coiled Nautiloid
    By Architeuthoceras in forum Nautiloids
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: Dec 01, '05, 12:35pm
  4. News item about Ordovician extinction
    By Melissa in forum General Cephalopod Fossil Discussions
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: Apr 18, '05, 4:05pm
  5. New Ordovician extinction theory?
    By tonmo in forum General Cephalopod Fossil Discussions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Jan 08, '04, 8:56pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •