View Full Version : [NEWS]: Transvestite Cuttlefish
Clem Jul 7th, 2004, 07:52pm :lol:
ITEM: Australian Cuttlefish Cross-Dress for Reproductive Advantage (http://news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,10056839%255E13762,00.html)
But are they executive transvestite cuttlefish?
Clem
um... Jul 7th, 2004, 11:12pm ;)
Here's where I have to wonder whether or not I should post my typical response.
joel_ang Jul 8th, 2004, 03:26am I saw this sometime ago on discovery.
Sneaky lil buggers :heee:
Infusoria Jul 8th, 2004, 06:02am :lol:
ITEM: Australian Cuttlefish Cross-Dress for Reproductive Advantage (http://news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,10056839%255E13762,00.html)
But are they executive transvestite cuttlefish?
Clem
Genius :jester:
love_newf Jul 8th, 2004, 04:35pm Amazing...reminds me of something...can't quite put my finger on it...oh yeah... my ex-husband. :P
http://www.tonmo.com/phpBB/download.php?id=2724
Steve O'Shea Jul 8th, 2004, 04:41pm :shock:
I feel ill!
Tintenfisch Jul 8th, 2004, 05:24pm :shock: I feel ill!
I think you're just jealous. :twisted:
Clem Jul 8th, 2004, 05:36pm Heh.
Seriously, though, doesn't this seem like a risky gambit? Even if the younger male cuttles are swifter than their elder competitors, wouldn't some of them be, ah, violated by the males they've duped?
:goofysca:
Clem, Mrs.
cthulhu77 Jul 8th, 2004, 09:45pm Absolutely horrifying...yikes.
I doubt that the eminent Herr Doktor would be jealous, Kat...but then again, he does listen to NEIL DIAMOND !!!! :shock:
Tintenfisch Jul 8th, 2004, 11:55pm When the larger males were not looking, the smaller males reverted to their normal colour and quickly mated with the females
Well, 'sneaking' behavior (smaller males being tricksy rather than taking on large competitors head-to-head) is a pretty well-documented reproductive strategy; I did a study on it once in wetas (really big, ugly bugs). Though they hadn't evolved into the cross-dressing phase yet... does seem like it would carry certain, er, risks. :roll:
Steve O'Shea Jul 9th, 2004, 02:55am Personally ... I like wearing dresses .... high heels and .... fishnets :madsci:
But I most certainly AM NOT IN TO BOTTOM TRAWLING!!!!
Steve O'Shea Jul 9th, 2004, 02:58am Love_newf .... what have you started? Cease and desist, pleeeeeeeze!
Ps, in support of Sir Dr Ummm......, Neil ROCKS!!!
PPS, so too do cuttlefish, squid & octopus (in keeping with the programme)!
love_newf Jul 9th, 2004, 09:43am Love_newf .... what have you started? Cease and desist, pleeeeeeeze!
I don't know if I can... I may be past the point of no return. :|
cthulhu77 Jul 9th, 2004, 11:16am Yep, you smack a neil diamond lover on the nose and they run around crying "foul!".
Strange, that is what I say every time I hear a ND song...hmmm... :lol:
um... Jul 9th, 2004, 11:23am But you shouldn't smack them with their own stolen articles, though. That's just a little bit too tacky.
:x
OctopusV Jul 9th, 2004, 02:34pm :lol: Executive tranvestite cuttlefish, oh boy, on the subject of the subjectless, you can pick up a good deal on the Dress to Kill DVD at Virgin Records. Strangley, I find executive transvestite cuttlefish easier to swallow than action transvestive cuttlefish. As for love newf's pic, well... it reminds me of when I was seven and my mom and sister kept on getting "ideas" :bonk: I wonder if it had anything to do with triggering my borderline insanity.
OctopusV Aug 16th, 2004, 09:32pm And they all akwardly backed away, leaving the thread to die and decay...
Clem Jan 20th, 2005, 11:45am Breaking News:
Transvestite Cuttlefish Survey Results (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4188495.stm)
:roll:
Clem
chrono_war01 Jan 20th, 2005, 12:01pm Pretty soon, the larger males will try to mate with every single femaling looking cuttle to be on the safe side, but that evoution, we'll see that in the next decade I fink.
um... Jan 20th, 2005, 04:11pm All of the Republican cuttlefish are going to be up in arms over this.
Clem Jan 20th, 2005, 04:19pm um...,
Oh, I don't know. I hear Rupert Murdoch did pretty much the same thing when he was courting his wife. Not coincidentally, he's Australian, too.
:twisted:
Clem, waiting for the lawsuit
erich orser Jan 20th, 2005, 07:17pm I actually know a couple of straight guys here in LA that use the exact same strategy. It also helps that they seem to know exactly where to shop. Women love their ensembles, want to know more, approach...
sneaky, I suppose, but all's fair in love and war. Gotta get around the bullies somehow...
chrono_war01 Jan 21st, 2005, 04:12am I used to stuff toilet paper under my shirt and shoes to look taller and have bigger muslces in school so the bullies don't dare get me. An exact opposite to the cuttles. :grin:
Tintenfisch Feb 3rd, 2005, 01:22am Wellll... depends where under your shirt you were stuffing the toilet paper, and how much. :roll:
chrono_war01 Feb 3rd, 2005, 03:15am bit like paper-mache, you stuff it round your biceps and make your chest have a six pack (of paper) :lol: :lol:
erich orser Feb 3rd, 2005, 06:30am I just want to deleat the last post, thank you.
chrono_war01 Feb 3rd, 2005, 10:17am I didn't notice what your wrote.
erich orser Feb 3rd, 2005, 07:36pm Good! Then I got to it in time. It drifted further off the thread and, although not profane, wasn't entirely suitable for general consumption. I can be a bit of a vulgarian sometimes.
Back to the thread, however, I find it remarkable if not entirely surprising that these cuttles have made this adaptation in their behaviour; anybody who has observed mating competition between cuttles has seen how belligerant the dominant males can be. I've noticed a number of nasty wounds on the losers in aquariums. My question is how long it has taken the female-impersonators to adopt this behavioural ruse, or has it only been noticed recently but has been probably going-on indefinitely? Since alpha males are traditionally the ones that propagate a healthy species, how could this ultimately effect their evolution if the traditionally weaker ones are now getting to mate?
Squidman Feb 3rd, 2005, 08:52pm That is very smart for those wimpy males! Covert mating...ewww...
um... Feb 3rd, 2005, 11:18pm Since alpha males are traditionally the ones that propagate a healthy species, how could this ultimately effect their evolution if the traditionally weaker ones are now getting to mate?
Is evolution really seeking to create the biggest, meanest cuttlefish in the sea? I'm going to go all Richard Dawkins here and assert that 'survival of the fittest' is a manifestation of genes simply trying to make the most copies of themselves. Being an alpha male is generally a very sound way to get genes copied, and is in a sense the 'safest bet'. However, if an animal can survive until sexual maturity and manage to plant some seeds, then the genes still have a chance of being propagated. Evidently, some cross-dressing cuttles manage to reproduce and pass on the cross-dressing genes. These devious little deviants are in the minority, and will stay that way unless being weak but crafty becomes a superior strategy (Revenge of the Nerd Cuttlefish?). So, I'd expect the species to stay healthy (unless we manage to wipe them out). Are the dominant cuttles possibly a little better off, too, if they don't have to fight gruelling battles with every male that comes along?
:cuttle: <-- it's difficult to see the lipstick (beakstick?)
erich orser Feb 3rd, 2005, 11:51pm "Reveng of the Nerd Cuttlefish", hmmm...
Incidentally, Richard Dawkins was a special guest on the Holland America's Zaandam for a CFI cruise in the Caribbean last December. A whole boatload of skeptics visiting the Islands would have been fun!
chrono_war01 Feb 4th, 2005, 11:24am hm...very werid about the aphla male part, but when the Nerdy cuttles are not the minority anymore, the alpha males will problably know that any female looking cuttle could be mated, then the Nerdy cuttles will have a real bad day.
|
|