View Full Version : Prehistoric Cephalopod Poll.
Phil Nov 25th, 2003, 06:02am So many to choose from......which do you think are the most interesting?
(Of course the results of this poll have absolutely no bearing on future articles I might write....honest).
:meso: :vampyro: :ammonite: :nautiloi: :belemnit: :cuttle: :bluering: :nautilus:
tonmo Nov 25th, 2003, 06:53am :ammonite:! But the rest are not far behind...
joel_ang Nov 25th, 2003, 07:28am I would kinda like to see those giants alive :twisted:
Melissa Nov 25th, 2003, 09:02am Hi Phil
Before reading your articles and threads on fossils, I would have said "Aren't living cephs interesting enough?" Now I can't decide. I'll reread your article, and if I understand more, I'll try to answer the poll.
Melissa
Phil Nov 25th, 2003, 09:34am Before reading your articles and threads on fossils, I would have said "Aren't living cephs interesting enough?"
That's what I voted!
:shock:
Phil Nov 25th, 2003, 08:42pm Hmmm........following the TONMO barometer.
Cretaceous squids are winning. Perhaps something on Tusoteuthis and Niobrarateuthis perhaps? You know this is probably the most difficult of the lot.....there is so little out there.
chrono_war01 Jan 16th, 2005, 05:09am I voted for giant squids, but wheres the anicent :vampyro: ? I thought they might also be interesting.
Phil Jan 16th, 2005, 06:44am Ooops, that was a bit of an oversight on my part and I should have included them, chrono. I think at the time, it was over a year ago, I didn't think I could scrape up enough info to write an article on them as at the time I though there were only two forms known. Since then, I found details of a third and a few months ago knocked up the article you can see in the 'Fossils' section if you would like to take a look.
Silly me, yes it should have been there!
Snafflehound Jan 16th, 2005, 05:03pm :belemnit:
nobody is interested in belemnites
poor belemnites :oops:
chrono_war01 Jan 17th, 2005, 04:07am Ooops, that was a bit of an oversight on my part and I should have included them, chrono. I think at the time, it was over a year ago, I didn't think I could scrape up enough info to write an article on them as at the time I though there were only two forms known. Since then, I found details of a third and a few months ago knocked up the article you can see in the 'Fossils' section if you would like to take a look.
Silly me, yes it should have been there!
o....Phil made a mistake, Phil made mistake...(contiunes chanting like a idiot)
LOL, shouldn't have done that. :mrgreen: As to the fossil parts, I'm going to take a look now.
Jean Jan 17th, 2005, 06:51pm I voted for Goniatites (mainly cos I got one!!) but really you need an "All of the above!".......I'm a generalist!
J
chrono_war01 Jan 30th, 2005, 06:28am I agree :wink:
Emperor Jan 30th, 2005, 09:51pm Ammonites - I lived near Whitby when I was a kid and they were some of the first fossils we studied indepth in invertebrate palaeontology so I have a soft spot for them.
I've just moved a paper and spotted that I have one on my desk as a paperweight (although as the paper was on top we must have words ;) ).
Emps
Phil Jan 31st, 2005, 08:51am Wow, Emperor. I didn't know you have studied invertebrate palaeontology! :notworth:
Do you have a photo of your ammonite to post here? I would expect it is probably a Dactylioceras or Hildoceras, but I'm sure Andy would be able to tell you exactly. Have you seen the ammonites he found in his article posted here a couple of weeks ago? They are from very close by to the area.
spartacus Jan 31st, 2005, 12:19pm I voted belemnites as I'm still pushing my "belemnite gravel" at give away prices !
what's more, they are in fact caused by lightning hitting the deck, it was on't telly
Keef
neuropteris Feb 4th, 2005, 05:04pm Ammonites - so many shapes, so many sizes, big ones, little ones - some as big as your 'ed! More species than you can shake a stick at and so easy to find (if your lucky enough to live near the little blighters burial grounds)
Andy
|
|