View Full Version : "Find the ceph in this photo" game


gholland
Jun 13th, 2008, 11:28am
I've been having some fun playing "Find the ceph in this photo" game with Dreadhead, cuttlefishguy, and others lately and wanted to more-or-less "organize the game" into a single, on-going thread and invite everyone to post their challenges here as well as establish some simple guidelines for posting answers.

Rules:
1. Post a pic of a hard-to-spot ceph.
2. Indicate what kind of ceph and how many people should look for.
3. Include a link to another version of the same photo (in your TONMO gallery or a photo archive site) where the hiding place is clearly indicated. Please don't post the answers in this thread.
4. Please do not discuss answers publicly in this thread. Use private messaging so you don't ruin the game for others.
5. Do not alter the hue, saturation, color, or other characteristics to make the cephalopod more difficult to find. Cropping, re-sizing, and minor adjustment to brightness, contrast, sharpness, etc. are acceptable within reason.

If you have old photos from your journal thread or other "find the ceph" posts that would be good for this game, please feel free to repost and consolidate them here.

Here's an example of what I have in mind (realize that this is the normal red tank lighting that we use for our mercs... not a color alteration):

Find the octopus in the photo below.
Check your answer here (http://www.tonmo.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=25&pictureid=137).

gholland
Jun 13th, 2008, 11:29am
Thoughts or suggestions?

robyn
Jun 13th, 2008, 11:40am
great idea. That one took me about 5 minutes....not so easy!

gholland
Jun 13th, 2008, 11:51am
Thanks robyn! I guess "ease" is in the eye of the photographer! Maybe all statements regarding difficulty should be avoided too, eh? :wink:

dreadhead
Jun 13th, 2008, 06:48pm
Took me awhile but I got it.

Keith
Jun 13th, 2008, 09:30pm
i think i found it.

Taollan
Jun 14th, 2008, 01:43am
Thats good. I like that because it is obvious once you find it.
:lol:

tonmo
Jun 14th, 2008, 05:26am
I love this idea -- great format, keep going! Did you alter the hue at all? I find that incredibly difficult to spot, even with your "click here for the answer"! That might be another rule -- do not alter the photo.

gholland
Jun 14th, 2008, 08:03am
Thanks Tony. No, I didn't alter the hue. That's a straight no-flash pic of our merc tank with the red vellum cover under the fluorescent lighting.

Good job guys! Who's next?

dreadhead
Jun 14th, 2008, 10:52am
one cuttle.check answer here (http://www.tonmo.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=3&pictureid=138).

gholland
Jun 14th, 2008, 12:14pm
Perfect... I got it right, but my head is now sore after 10 minutes of :banghead:!

Cheers Dread!
:cheers:

dreadhead
Jun 14th, 2008, 12:26pm
Awesome, I love this thread.;)

dwhatley
Jun 22nd, 2008, 11:31pm
My turn. This is an unretouched photo I took snorkeling. Find the Hummelincki :tongue:

Answer: Here (http://www.tonmo.com/forums/album.php?albumid=27&pictureid=144)

gholland
Jun 23rd, 2008, 10:06am
Nice one D! And your retouch on that is amazing... what program are you using?

dwhatley
Jun 23rd, 2008, 07:24pm
Nice one D! And your retouch on that is amazing... what program are you using?

It seems that Photoshop (I have an old Limited Edition, not the expensive version - eBay :razz:) handles the underwater green very well with auto correct. There is some extra blue with the photoshopping but what a great change for a single click. I have a baracuda that is brown instead of green and the results are not good. I know that AM's camera (that I am looking at for Xmas - Canon G9) has a built in correction for underwater photography and am hoping this will be the results. The camera I was borrowing (Olympus) has a red filter for the UW housing but it only helps for below 15' and I removed it for this snorkle. However, I was not all that happy with the results during my one dive and will see what PS will do with those shots as well.

gholland
Jul 17th, 2008, 09:19pm
Find the single Octopus mercatoris in the photo below.
Check your answer here (http://www.tonmo.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=25&pictureid=160).

esquid
Jul 17th, 2008, 09:22pm
that's a good one. I like the red herring snail shell.

gholland
Jul 17th, 2008, 09:27pm
Shhhhh... :wink:

Jean
Jul 17th, 2008, 09:30pm
got him/her :grin:

dwhatley
Jul 18th, 2008, 03:25am
Enlarging made it simple:twisted:

dwhatley
Sep 5th, 2008, 03:05am
Click here (http://www.tonmo.com/forums/album.php?albumid=27&pictureid=172) to confirm your find.

Journal forthcoming when she has a name. We have considered Ethyl (in honor of Octane of course) and Serendipity but the jury is still out :tongue:

gholland
Sep 5th, 2008, 08:21am
Good game! That's wonderful D! Congratulations to you and welcome to Ethyl/Serendipity!

monty
Sep 5th, 2008, 12:03pm
:welcome: :octopus:!

sorseress
Sep 5th, 2008, 01:32pm
Cute and fun! Welcome baby :octopus:!

Animal Mother
Sep 5th, 2008, 01:53pm
D, I'm going to have to find out your source when Grover passes on!

dwhatley
Sep 5th, 2008, 09:41pm
D, I'm going to have to find out your source when Grover passes on!

Unfortunately, the consideration for naming her Serendipity is the manner of acquisition. I will post the story sometime tonight, assuming a name is finally chosen (hard to do when you can't find her).

dwhatley
Sep 11th, 2008, 01:47am
If I had not been watching, I would not have found her here (http://www.tonmo.com/forums/album.php?albumid=27&pictureid=173)