View Full Version : Why all the Ammonoid Fossils


Architeuthoceras
Aug 22nd, 2003, 10:29am
Alot of ammonoids died in an ancient sea that is now the desert of the western US. I have gathered some of the evidence and posted it to my website.

Anasibirites Beds (http://www.ammonoid.com/anastudy.html)

More information about ammonoids can be found in Phil's article

Ammonites (http://www.tonmo.com/science/public/ammonites.php)

Have a look at the evidence and help me try to figure out why they all got where they are. There are alot of pictures so unless you have a fast internet connection it may take awhile.

Have Fun!
:ammonite:

Phil
Aug 22nd, 2003, 08:08pm
Hmm........if they died during spawning then I doubt you would see such disparate sizes of ammnoids as they should all be adults. Do you think you may have juveniles in there?

Toxic environment? Possibly. I wonder what could have caused it?

Washed in? Possibly. If so, I would anticipate that fragments of other creatures might be washed in too. Any traces of these?

What do you think, Kevin? (After the poll finishes, that is!)

Clem
Aug 22nd, 2003, 11:17pm
Toxic environment? Possibly. I wonder what could have caused it?

Kevin & Phil,

Could it have been an algal bloom?

Did they have toxic algal blooms back in the Triassic?

:?:

Clem

Melissa
Aug 23rd, 2003, 01:06pm
This is fascinating. While I love the landscape of the southwestern US, I never imagined that articles about rocks would interest me. I was tempted by "condensed beds" only because it calls up a picture of bunk beds collapsing, but I voted for the toxic environment because it is a very wide brush: colossal meteors, algae, and bad weather could all qualify. Could climate change create a "toxic" environment? If you've had heatstroke, you might think so.

Kevin, can you tell us about what else you've found at this site? We there other kinds of animal or plant life? Any theories about what might have been there but which didn't fossilize? Why am I surprised that this is more interesting to me than the work I should be doing!?

Melissa

Architeuthoceras
Aug 24th, 2003, 12:56pm
The only other fossils I can see in the beds are small gastropods less than 2mm high. Other fossils found in other strata of the thaynes formation in the study area are gastropods, bivalves, scaphopods, echinoids, ophiuroids, crinoids, and sponges.

Most of the grains in the Meekoceras beds and other limestone beds in the area are small broken pieces of mollusc shells and echinoderms, the matrix is a sparite, making a Bio-sparite.
The grains in the anasibirites beds are alot smaller, the matrix is a micrite, making a Bio-micrite.

Ammonoids are usually dimorphic, a small microconch (male) and a larger macroconch (female), sometimes ornament on the shell differentiates male and female, a robust, strongly ornamented (male), and a gracile, smooth (female) shell, both about the same size. But as Phil mentioned the adults would all be about the same relative size.

But what if you had a polymorphic specie? Just a thought! I have to do a lot more cutting and sectioning to see if all the fossil ammonoids in the beds are adult, or a family grouping (theres another thought, ammonoids rearing their young).

It seems that any kind of toxic environment would not only kill the ammonoids, but every other critter swimming in the sea at that time and that place. Why only ammonoids? Why only ammonoids fossilized? Why only one basic shape of ammonoid? Some of the ammonoids in the lower beds occur in beds above the anasibirites beds, so they would have been around at that time, maybe just not that place.

:ammonite:

Architeuthoceras
Aug 24th, 2003, 01:03pm
Remember, this took place right after the End-Permian Mass extinction event (3my is a very short time geologically). At least 80% of all life on earth was gone. What ever caused that extinction could still be affecting the worlds environment. At any rate there was a great diversification taking place, all those empty niches being filled.

Architeuthoceras
Oct 21st, 2004, 10:09am
Some new evidence has come to my attention about the condition of another form of life that lived at the same time as these ammonoids. It seems that gastropods were having a tough time of it.

Early Triassic Gastropods (abstract) (http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2003AM/finalprogram/abstract_59957.htm)

Sinbad Limestone microgastropods (http://www.pal.uni-erlangen.de/mitarbeiter/nuetzel/page/mk-snails1.html)

If ammonoids made it through the End-Permian mass Extinction "semi-easy" (easier than the gastropods) I wonder why they didnt get through the KT event (or interval), the gastropods did.

I still havent voted in this poll as I am still trying to figure it all out :heee:

cthulhu77
Oct 21st, 2004, 10:18am
the more I study earth events, the more confusing it becomes...so many wheels within wheels...
The toxic bloom theory is good,as is the washed in, but like Phil said, where are the rest of the other animals?
( Perhaps the old gods had a ammonite-boil, and threw all the shells into one spot?)
If the cause was riverine, it seems that more shells would be crushed...
Of course, I really know little about ammonites, but the arguments and discussions attended regarding archosaurs are somewhat similar..
Haven't voted yet, either. Confusing in a great way..
Perhaps a massive bloom of red algae? This could have been caused by an earth trauma that overloaded the water in certain, specific areas...

snafflehound@work
Oct 21st, 2004, 04:09pm
Maybe it had something to do with the emergence of R'lyeh :cthulhu: :P

Architeuthoceras
Feb 7th, 2008, 11:13am
Abstract (http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2008CD/finalprogram/abstract_135311.htm)

:smoke:

monty
Feb 7th, 2008, 02:57pm
congrats!

Architeuthoceras
Feb 28th, 2008, 10:49pm
If you go to this page (http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2008CD/finalprogram/session_22367.htm), you will notice there has been a speaker change on paper #12-9...:goofysca:

I will update this thread after the meetings.

monty
Feb 28th, 2008, 11:16pm
:fingerscrossed:

dwhatley
Feb 28th, 2008, 11:41pm
Between new PHd's, new published papers, new up-coming books and new speaking engagements, TONMO is certainly well endowed:glass:

Phil
Mar 7th, 2008, 09:44pm
Good luck Kevin. You'll be just great. I hope you enjoy the experience as much as the audience enjoys listening to you!

Pity we can't pod-cast your lecture here. Or can we, Tony?

Architeuthoceras
Mar 11th, 2008, 12:20am
Thanks for the encouragement Phil, but as the time gets closer the knee shakes get stronger and the lips quiver faster. I thought about picturing the audience naked, but realized they would probably be alot of old bearded paleontologists and the shakes got worse. :goofysca:

Echioceras
Mar 12th, 2008, 02:50pm
Good luck!

Architeuthoceras
Mar 22nd, 2008, 10:46pm
It turns out there are alot more young ladies becoming paleontologists these days, and picturing them naked just made me forget half the talk. It got said at any rate.

Basically the answer is #2- Toxic environment, anoxia to be specific, or #5- a combination. A global warming event, caused by increased atmospheric CO2 (probably from volcanism in Siberia), changed the latitudinal temperature gradient of the Panthalassic ocean causing an ammonoid extinction between the beds with Inyoites and the beds with Anasibirites. Faunas before this event were high diversity and latitudinally restricted, those after were low diversity, cosmopolitan faunas. The Prionitids (the family containing Wasatchites and Anasibirites) somehow survived this extinction and proliferated. So it may be that there was just alot of ammonoids or an "Anasibirites bloom". An anoxic event that started in the beds below the Inyoites beds and reached its peak sometime during the time the Anasibirites beds were being deposited (before, during or after the beds in our study?) probably was the final straw for the Prionitids as they too went through an extinction at the end of the Smithian Stage. Ammonoids in the following Spathian Stage started to regain their high diversity, latitudinal restricted, normal existence. So, really, all this just brings up more questions. :wink:

a few references:
Galfetti et. al. 2007a (http://www.climategeology.ethz.ch/publications/2007_Galfetti_et_al_Geol.pdf)
Galfetti et. al. 2007b (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V6R-4M282CR-2&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=ce943797e0a0b025cf4db83ab6625090)
Brayard et. al. 2006 (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V6R-4JS1TN3-1&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=bf6ba578f93cab69a8f15a04f572b396)

monty
Mar 23rd, 2008, 12:47am
:notworth: congrats!

Architeuthoceras
Apr 4th, 2008, 08:24pm
If you view the abstract now, you can download a 4.8M pdf file of the presentation.

Lower Triassic Ammonoid Beds in the Confusion Range of Western Utah (http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2008CD/finalprogram/abstract_135311.htm)

(near the bottom called "Presentation Handout" :wink: